AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (111) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Probably not a market mover...
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
piperfarmer
Posted 2/10/2025 10:14 (#11097515 - in reply to #11097437)
Subject: So tell me how these programs "are working for the farmers" (you wanted facts, I give you facts)


southeast nebraska
Hilltop Husker - 2/10/2025 09:18

No I'm correct. If you want to refute me go find some data yourself.


Okay smart boy explain away instead of making a cutsey answer of "find it yourself"



$2 million for sex changes and "LGBT activism" in Guatemala.

$6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.

$20 million on “Ahlan Simsim” — a new Sesame Street show in Iraq.

Over $4.5 million to “combat disinformation” in Kazakhstan.

Up to $10 million worth of USAID-funded meals went to al Qaeda-linked terrorist group the Nusra Front.

$500,000 to group that “empowers women” in an attempt to solve sectarian violence in Israel just 10 days before Hamas’s Oct. 7 attacks.

Awarded nearly $25 million to Deloitte to promote green transportation in Georgia (the country).

$4.67 million to EcoHealth Alliance, one of the key nongovernmental organizations funding bat virus research at Wuhan Institute of Virology, in late 2021.

$20 million for the Strengthening Transparency and Accountability through Investigative Reporting program which used the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project as its implementing partner. The OCCRP was cited four times in the whistleblower letter that led to the Russiagate impeachment.

USAID’s 2022-2030 climate strategy outlined a $150 billion “whole-of-Agency approach” to building an "equitable world with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions."

$7.9 million to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid “binary-gendered language.”

$1.1 million to an Armenian LGBT group.

$1.2 million to the African Methodist Episcopal Church Service and Development Agency in Washington, D.C., to build “a state-of-the-art 440-seat auditorium.”

$1.3 million to Arab and Jewish photographers.

$1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica.

$1.5 million to “rebuild” the Cuban media ecosystem.

$1.5 million for “art for inclusion of people with disabilities.”

$2 million to promote “LGBT equality through entrepreneurship … in developing Latin American countries.”

$2.1 million so the BBC can strengthen the media ecosystem in Libya, “designed to value the diversity of Libyan society.”

$2.3 million for “artisanal and small-scale gold mining” in the Amazon.

$2.5 million to promote “inclusion” in Vietnam.

$3.9 million to LGBT causes in the Western Balkans.

$5.5 million to LGBT in Uganda.

$6 million to advance LGBT in “priority countries around the world.”

$6 million to “Transform Digital Spaces to Reflect Feminist Democratic Principles.”

$6.3 million to men who have sex with men in South Africa.

$8.3 million for “USAID Education: Equity and Inclusion.”

$16.8 million to a separate group in Vietnam for “inclusion.”

$50 million to fund condoms in Gaza

$1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces

$70,000 for the production of a DEI musical in Ireland

$48,000 for the production of a gay activist opera in Columbia

$5.4 billion to Ukraine

$1.23 billion to Jordan to house Syrians (having been to Jordan, they don't need our money)



Now I am sure you are going to chirp in like a good little democrat parrot that "hurr durr that be small amount compared to what deh be given to dah furmers"

okay

Well, lets look at that

By their OWN books, of the $32.5 billion in spending, about one-quarter went to health and population ( that is the stuff that could be even REMOTELY attached to "farmers", and not all of that is directly related to "farmers" ). About one-quarter went to humanity programs (see the above list for examples of "humanity programs") and the agency allocated about $7 billion to governance and another $3.6 billion to administrative costs.

So big boy, by their own admission less than 1/4 of their spending goes to ANYTHING THAT COULD BE REMOTELY related to ANYTHING "farmer" related

So how is it again that they are "almost ENTIRELY WORKING FOR THE FARMERS"....






Edited by piperfarmer 2/10/2025 10:34
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)